MANAJEMEN INDUSTRI TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (PERTEMUAN 1)
Project
A project is a complex, non-routine, one-time effort limited by time, budget, resources, and performance specifications designed to meet customer needs
The major goal: to satisfy a customer’s need
A project can be considered to be any series of activities and tasks that have the major characteristics:
An established objective Have a specific objective to be completed within certain specifications
A defined life span with a beginning and an end Have defined start and end dates
Usually, the involvement of several departments and professionals Are multifunctional (i.e., cut across several function lines)
Typically, doing something that has never been done before
Specific time, cost, and performance requirements
Have funding limits (if applicable)
Consume human and nonhuman resources (i.e., money, people, equipment)
The Project Life Cycle
The life cycle recognizes that projects have a limited life span and that there are predictable changes in level of effort and focus over the life of the project
Project effort starts slowly, builds to peak, and then declines to delivery of the project to the customer
Four typically stages:
Definition
Planning
Execution
Delivery
Definition
specifications of the project are defined
project objectives are established
teams are formed
major responsibilities are assigned
Planning
The level of effort increases
Plans are developed to determine:
What the project will entail
when it will be scheduled
whom it will benefit
what quality level should be maintained
what the budget will be
Execution
A major portion of the project work takes place—both physical and mental
The physical product is produced
Time, cost, and specification measures are used for control
Is the project on schedule, on budget, and meeting specifications
What are the forecasts of each these measures
What revisions/changes are necessary
Delivery
Delivering the project product to the customer
Customer training
Transferring documents
Redeploying project resources
Releasing project equipment/materials to other projects
Finding new assignments for team members
Project Management
Is the art of creating the illusion that any outcome is the result of a series of predetermined, deliberate acts when, in fact, it was dumb luck
Is the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources for a relatively short-term objective that has been established to complete specific goals and objectives.
Furthermore, project management utilizes the systems approach to management by having functional personnel (the vertical hierarchy) assigned to a specific project (the horizontal hierarchy)
Involves project planning and project monitoring
Project planning
Definition of work requirements
Definition of quantity and quality of work
Definition of resources needed
Project monitoring
Tracking progress
Comparison actual outcome to predicted outcome
Analyzing impact
Making adjustments
The Importance of Project Management
Compression of the Product Life Cycle
Global Competition
Knowledge Explosion
Corporate Downsizing
Increased Customer Focus
Rapid Development of Third World and Closed Economies
Small Projects Represent Big Problems
Successful project management can then be defined as having achieved the project objectives:
Within the allocated time period
Within the budgeted cost
At the desired performance/technology level (at the proper performance or specification level)
While utilizing the assigned resources effectively and efficiently
With acceptance by the customer/user
With minimum or mutually agreed upon scope changes
Without disturbing the main work flow of the organization
Without changing the corporate culture
The potential benefits from project management are:
Identification of functional responsibilities to ensure that all activities are accounted for, regardless of personnel turnover
Minimizing the need for continuous reporting
Identification of time limits for scheduling
Identification of a methodology for trade-off analysis
Measurement of accomplishment against plans
Early identification of problems so that corrective action may follow
Improved estimating capability for future planning
Knowing when objectives cannot be met or will be exceeded
Unfortunately, the benefits cannot be achieved without overcoming obstacles such as:
Project complexity
Customer’s special requirements and scope changes
Organizational restructuring
Project risks
Changes in technology
Forward planning and pricing
The Project Manager
Management decides and implements the ways and means to effectively and efficiently utilize human and nonhuman resources to reach predetermined objectives (money, manpower, equipment, facilities, materials, information/technology)
Project managers perform the same functions as other managers: they plan, schedule, motivate, and control
The project manager is unique because she/he manages temporary, non-repetitive activities and frequently acts independently of the formal organization
Project managers are expected to marshal resources to complete a fixed-life project on time, on budget, and within specifications
Project managers are the direct link to the customer and must manage the interface between customer expectations and what is feasible and reasonable
Project managers provide direction, coordination, and integration to the project team, which is often made up of part-time participants loyal to their functional departments
Project managers are responsible for performance (frequently with too little authority)
Project managers must ensure that appropriate trade-offs are made between the time, cost, and performance requirements of the project
Project managers generally posses only rudimentary technical knowledge to make such decisions
Project managers must orchestrate the completion of the project by including the right people, at the right time, to address the right issues and make the right decisions
Discussion
What are the habits of successful project managers?
I’m an experienced individual contributor but very new to project management. How do I get my new project up and going?
The Project Manager-Line Manager Interface
Successful project management is strongly dependent on:
A good daily working relationship between the project manager and those line managers who directly assign resources to projects
The ability of functional employees to report vertically to line managers at the same time that they report horizontally to one or more project managers
The project manager actually works for the line managers, not vice versa the project manager is simply the agent through whom this is accomplished
Projects manager depend on line managers
Effective project management requires an understanding of:
Quantitative tools and techniques
Organizational structures
Organizational behaviour
The Project Manager’s Role
The project manager is responsible for coordinating and integrating activities across multiple functional lines
The integration activities performed by the project manager include
Integrating the activities necessary to develop a project plan
Integrating the activities necessary to execute the plan
Integrating the activities necessary to make changes to the plan
The project manager must convert the inputs into outputs of products, services, and ultimately profits
The project manager needs strong communicative and interpersonal skills, must become familiar with the operations of each line organization, and must have knowledge of the technology being used
The Line Manager’s Role
A specific role for the functional manager
The functional manager has the responsibility to define how the task will be done and where the task will be done (i.e., the technical criteria)
The functional manager has the responsibility to provide sufficient resources to accomplish the objective within the project’s constraints (i.e., who will get the job done)
The functional manager has the responsibility for deliverable
The line manager’s problems:
Unlimited work requests (especially during competitive bidding)
Predetermined deadlines
All requests having a high priority
Limited number of resources
Limited availability of resources
Unscheduled changes in the project plan
Unpredicted lack of progress
Unplanned absence of resources
Unplanned breakdown of resources
Unplanned loss of resources
Unplanned turnover of personnel
The Evolution of Project Management Systems
A three-phase model:
Phase One: Ad Hoc Use
Phase Two: Formal Application
Phase Three: Project-Driven Organization
Phase One: Ad Hoc Use
Typically begins with an individual or department champion initiating the use of one or more the basic project management tools in a project
The tools appear to hold potential for improving project success
Top management will have little or no involvement in the decision to use these tools
In a few cases, these attempts end in failure
Near the end of this phase, conflicts across functional lines often appear as tensions arise over the control and directions of projects
Phase Two: Formal Application
Various needs and inadequacies are recognized as barriers to project success
Typical of this phase is the recognition that project management training is needed for every management level in the organization
Top management takes an interest in better management of projects
The need for quality control becomes an issue
The concept of a customer or client for each project becomes part of the organizational culture
Projects managers are given more control over the projects
Questions relating to the effectiveness of the current organization structure are heard in private conversations
Top management is not active in project selection and prioritizing projects
Management needs a retreat to integrate strategic planning and projects
Phase Three: Project-Driven Organization
The outlook is long run
Top management is now playing a significant role in setting strategy, in developing a balanced project portfolio, and in setting project priorities
Project management is a part of the organizational culture
The organizational structure has shifted toward a project matrix and project teams with dedicated resources
Projects are integrated with accounting
Training and policy manuals have been written for each phase of the project life cycle
Termination of projects includes a project audit and evaluation of time, cost, and technical performance
The outcome of this effort is disciplined, integrated, organizational approach to managing and implementing projects linked to strategic plans
These three phase occur at different times depending on the type and size of the firm
It is probably desirous to move to phase three as quickly as possible to compete more effectively
Migration to excellence can be expedited by developing the skills and capabilities of every manager in the organization through training in project management
An Integrative Approach
As the world becomes more competitive, the importance of managing the process of project management and “getting it right the first time” takes on new meaning
Piecemeal systems fail to tie to the overall strategies of the firm
Piecemeal project priority systems fail to prioritize project selection to resources and those projects that contribute most to the strategic plan
Piecemeal tools and techniques fail to be integrated throughout the project life cycle
Piecemeal approaches fail to balance the application of project planning and control methods with appropriate adjustments in the organization’s culture to support project endeavour
Today emphasis is on development of an integrated project management process that focuses all project effort toward the strategic plan of the organization and reinforces mastery of both the project management tools/techniques and the interpersonal skills necessary to orchestrate successful project completion
Integration in project management directs attention to two key areas:
Integration of projects with the strategic plan
Integration within the process of managing actual projects
Integration of projects with the strategic plan
In some organizations, selection and management of projects often fail to support the strategic plan of the organization
Strategic plan are written by one group of managers, projects selected by another group, and projects implemented by another
An integrated project system is one in which all of the parts are interrelated
Mission, objectives, and strategies are set to meet the needs of customers
Development of a mission, objectives, and strategies depend on the external (political, social, economic and technological) and internal (management, facilities, core competencies, financial condition) environmental factors
Implementing strategies are the most difficult step; strategies are typically implemented through projects
Prioritizing projects so that scarce resources are allocated to the right projects
Integration within the process of managing actual projects
The technical side of the management process
Consists of the formal, disciplined, pure logic parts of the process
Relies on the formal information system available
Includes planning, scheduling, and controlling: Scope, WBS, Schedules, Resource Allocation, Baseline Budgets, Status Reports
Represents the “science” of project management
The socio-cultural side of the management process
Involves the much messier, often contradictory and paradoxical world of implementation: leadership, problem solving, teamwork, negotiation, politics, customer expectations
Centres on creating a temporary social system within a larger organizational environment that combines the talents of a divergent set of professionals working to complete the project
Involves managing the interface between the project and external environment
Represents the “art” of managing a project
Project-Driven versus Non-Project-Driven Organizations
Project-Driven Organization
All work is characterized through projects, with each project as a separate cost centre having its own profit-and-loss statement
The total profit to the corporation is simply the summation of the profits on all projects
Everything centres around the projects
Non-Project-Driven Organization
Profit-and-loss are measured on vertical or functional lines
Projects exist merely to support the product lines or functional lines
Priority resources are assigned to the revenue-producing functional line activities rather than the projects
Project management in a non-project-driven organization is generally more difficult for these reasons:
Projects may be few and far between
Not all projects have the same project management requirements, and therefore they cannot be managed identically. This difficulty results from poor understanding of project management and a reluctance of companies to invest in proper training
Executives do not have sufficient time to manage projects themselves, yet refuse to delegate authority
Projects tend to be delayed because approvals most often follow the vertical chain of command. As a result, project work stays too long in functional departments
Because project staffing is on a “local” basis, only a portion of the organization understands project management and sees the system in action
There is heavy dependence on subcontractors and outside agencies for project management expertise
Non-project-driven organizations may also have a steady stream of projects, all of which are usually designed to enhance manufacturing operations.
Some projects may be customer-requested, such as:
The introduction of statistical dimensioning concepts to improve process control
The introduction of process changes to enhance the final product
The introduction of process change concepts to enhance product reliability
If these changes are not identified as specific projects, the result can be:
Poorly defined responsibility areas within the organization
Poor communication, both internal and external to the organization
Slow implementation
A lack of a cost-tracking system for implementation
Poorly defined performance criteria
The tip-of-the-iceberg syndrome can occur in all types of organizations but is most common in non-project-driven organizations
On the surface, all we see is lack of authority for the project manager. But, beneath the surface we see the causes; there is excessive meddling due to lack of understanding of project management, which, in turn, resulted from an inability to recognize the need for proper training
Marketing in the Project-Driven Organization
Getting new projects is the lifeblood of any project-oriented business
Marketing projects requires the ability to identify, pursue, and capture one-of-a-kind business opportunities, and is characterized by:
A systematic effort
Custom design
Project life cycle
Marketing phase
Risks
The technical capability to perform
In spite of the risks and problems, profits on projects are usually very low in comparison with commercial business practices
One may wonder why companies pursue project businesses
Clearly, there are many reasons why projects are good business:
Although immediate profits (as a percentage of sales) are usually small, the return on capital investment is often very attractive. Progress payment practices keep inventories and receivables to a minimum and enable companies to undertake projects many times larger in value than the assets of the total company
Once a contract has been secured and is being managed properly, the project may be of relatively low financial risk to the company. The company has little additional selling expenditure and has a predictable market over the life cycle of the project
Project business must be viewed from a broader perspective than motivation for immediate profits. Projects provide an opportunity to develop the company’s technical capabilities and build an experience base for future business growth
Winning one large project often provides attractive growth potential, such as (1) growth with the project via additions and changes; (2) follow-on work; (3) spare parts, maintenance, and raining; and (4) being able to compete effectively in the next project phase, such as nurturing a study program into a development contract and finally a production contract
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar